Jack of all trades

Someone at my workplace described me as “A Jack of all trades”. Now, I think I am supposed to take it as a compliment, but I am not sure that this is the case.

If I am a “Jack of all trades, master of none”, then I might take it as an insult. It implies that I am not very skilful in any of the areas in which I claim expertise or knowledge or that my skills are superficial rather than comprehensive.

However, the phrase was formerly intended as a compliment, meaning that a person is a generalist rather than a specialist, versatile and adept at many things.

The complete saying was, “A Jack of all trades, master of none, though oftentimes better than a master of one”. It implies that being mostly good at many things is better than being great at one thing and terrible at everything else.

I can relate to that.

The specialist knows more and more about less and less and finally knows everything about nothing. The generalist knows less and less about more and more and finally knows nothing about everything.
2021-10-21 12:35:49
I think that T shape is important. Low-level (conceptual) understanding/familiarity with most things in the domain. And one place where they are specialized. Sounds like your deep thing is in the realm of management?
2021-10-21 12:37:00