Internet gouging

I have more internet bandwidth than I know what to do with. My broadband internet connection for home gives me unlimited data. If I combine the data from my mobile phone plan, I never need to worry about going over my monthly data allowance.

I still recall my first internet plan back in the late 1990s, when I would dial into a connection on my telephone line. The best internet speed I could get was 56Kbps, which was fine for downloading a file, but it was next to useless if I wanted to stream music or download a video.

I first got broadband internet around 2005, which offered a higher volume of data faster by using an ADSL connection. Though I didn't have to turn my internet connection on and off, I did have to be careful about the data I used. The data included in my monthly plan was small, and the cost for exceeding my data limit was astronomical.

The internet service providers had worked out how much someone was prepared to pay for a connection, and $50 a month seemed to be the sweet spot. They would throttle down the available data at that price point and tempt you to a higher data plan for extra money.

So now, with video and other streaming services, my data needs have increased significantly, and it is directly beneficial to have as much data as I can consume. However, the internet service providers now use the speed at which they deliver the data as their lever to push users to a higher plan.

I like to have a fast internet connection, so I pay the premium for it. As a result, not much has changed for how internet service providers gouge more out of their customers.
I've experienced going online on a dial-up connection  20 something years ago, the national mobile phone company was selling cards with 10h or more of internet access. I once download a video clip, it took me 3 days. I wonder what the internet would be like in 20 years from now. Bandwidth would probably become irrelevant just as data packages, (as a marketing sell point)
2021-09-06 19:40:04
maybe just passing around 'the entirety of the internet' as hashed blockchains (maybe 2-5 major ones) and you can just access most of it offline? except when you need to run real transactions? 

that would be cool. but prob not.
2021-09-07 01:51:16
What about a completely decentralised internet  hosted on a plethora of interconnected devices all over the world, from wearables and appliances to supercomputers. It's all relative to computing power, if a major breakthrough happens in computing then we'll see another round of disruptive tech taking over each and every industry. I'm thinking of material science and biomanufacturing as 2 key areas that can:
1. lower manufacturing costs
2. facilitate recycling and waste transformation
3. synthetic food production
4. nanotech medicine, lab-grown organs etc
5. enable space exploration
6. sustainable energy-efficient transportation
7. infrastructure
8. construction
9.......
2021-09-07 08:07:50
abrahamKim
promising quantum computing companies:
psiquantum.com/resources | Silicon photonic quantum computing
ionq.com/technology | not sure what exactly but looks intriguing 🤔 
2021-09-07 08:36:51
Wait so what is the decentralized hosting paradigm here? Isn't the internet technically decentralized? I mean i get it that most of its hosted in aggregated datacenters 
AWS
/etc...

and there's the huge platforms. (google/twitter/etc)

but what do you mean by totally decentralized. physically decentralized? ownership decentralized?

have a feeling you mean latter more so... with the former being an inherent attribute to serve the latter.

web3
 !!
2021-09-18 02:33:05