don't boil the ocean

A phrase my previous manager and now mentor used to say to focus the team was ‘don’t boil the ocean.’ 

His point is that meaningful work isn’t achieved by trying to solve everything a once. 

In fact, attempting to do that — attempting to boil the ocean — leads to very little progress if any. 

Instead, it’s infinitely more effective to focus intensely on one important problem, implement an acceptable solution, and then move on to the next. 

I may not always feel like you’re doing as much work, but you’ll certainly end up accomplishing more. 
Had another thought on this after running some errands and doing some housework:

Lines such as this: 
don't boil the ocean
feel like hyperbolic advisories.

Kind of like : you don't have to be a 
billionaire
to be happy.

Or you don't have to be as buff as 
Arnold Schwarzenegger
.

They are true, but present ineffective 
rhetoric
.

I believe this to be the case because of two reasons.

1. people immediately shut out things that feel obvious. They'll say "oh i already heard that" "i already know that" and they'll move along as before.

2. even if they do listen because maybe the adage is a new one to them or they happen to feel more open minded that day -- they don't know what to do next. 

Like if i don't need to be a billionaire to be happy then are you saying i should be a 9-figure millionaire? 8-figure millionaire?

If not as buff as Arnold are you telling me I should be -- blah blah blah.

The though i had as I was closing out my housework was that it'd be more effective to question what one's temperature is. What volume of water are you able to boil.

Are you a quarter gallon 
saucepan
?

Are you a industrial vat?

Tell someone don't boil the ocean they'll go try to boil a lake. When what would be most useful is probably asking.. what can i boil?
2022-07-02 17:50:36