The value propositions of most apps are easily tangible. A dashboard promising to increases writers' visibility into engagement levels or a unified app that allows marketers to control multiple email and social media accounts from a single solution.
When it comes to apps serving writers it's unsurprising that this same approach is taken. Founders try to create products that deliver an immediately visible promise. A streak tracker tied to a word counter that helps the writer visualize their consistency or a reminder notification that pings them that they're about to run out of time to maintain their streak.
I like to categorize these visible features under the category of productivity features because they attempt to deliver outcomes by increasing productivity / decreasing distractions taking away from that productivity.
When trying to craft a feeling of place and community, having productivity features although required isn't enough by themselves. Simply showing a writer their consistency and nudging them to write everyday might be enough for a busy writer who's main struggle in writing is not the writing itself but rather something external like scheduling. But from my experience I was never someone who needed more productivity and scheduling to help me write. That wasn't the bottleneck.
For me what has always cleared the throughput for writing has been a sense of community. With trying to experiment with Adagia Tribes, I'm attempting to create utility tool for writers to facilitate their own writing communities/places. My hypothesis is that such intangible feature that is not a productivity feature but rather dont-have-a-word-yet feature is what will lead to a writer writing more of the stuff that they want to write. The kind of writing they look back on and cherish.
When it comes to apps serving writers it's unsurprising that this same approach is taken. Founders try to create products that deliver an immediately visible promise. A streak tracker tied to a word counter that helps the writer visualize their consistency or a reminder notification that pings them that they're about to run out of time to maintain their streak.
I like to categorize these visible features under the category of productivity features because they attempt to deliver outcomes by increasing productivity / decreasing distractions taking away from that productivity.
When trying to craft a feeling of place and community, having productivity features although required isn't enough by themselves. Simply showing a writer their consistency and nudging them to write everyday might be enough for a busy writer who's main struggle in writing is not the writing itself but rather something external like scheduling. But from my experience I was never someone who needed more productivity and scheduling to help me write. That wasn't the bottleneck.
For me what has always cleared the throughput for writing has been a sense of community. With trying to experiment with Adagia Tribes, I'm attempting to create utility tool for writers to facilitate their own writing communities/places. My hypothesis is that such intangible feature that is not a productivity feature but rather dont-have-a-word-yet feature is what will lead to a writer writing more of the stuff that they want to write. The kind of writing they look back on and cherish.
what do writers do then? lol
on our call this week I'll tell you about pre-orthogonal categorization and how Stripe used ti to redesign their API.