Fake controversy

I avoid the news in general and specifically political news, but I couldn't pass up commenting on this story with the following headline: "Kamala Harris Using Wired Headphones and Having 'Bluetooth Phobia" Sparks Controversy."

What drew me to the story was the fact that the VP was bucking the trend of using Bluetooth headphones, and I wanted to know her reasoning. Maybe she understands that the EMF signals that are being sent directly through the brain are not a good idea. I stopped using AirPods and usually use a wired set of earbuds with EMF-shielding technology. Perhaps that may lead to some ridicule but certainly no controversy.

According to the article, Kamala eschews Bluetooth headphones because she "has long felt that Bluetooth headphones are a security risk." I'm not a security expert, and I have no idea how easy it is to compromise the security of Bluetooth devices. Maybe she's more secure, maybe not. At least she has the added benefit of minimizing EMF exposure, whether or not she realizes it. 

So what's the controversy here? What's wrong with using wired headphones/earbuds? It's a scandal that she can be seen clutching a bundled-up cord in interviews? Some people have way too much time on their hands.
Ohhh wondering what 
phaidenbauer
's opinion is on this. On the danger of bluetooth headphones not the kamala thing. 

I was just considering air pods but this makes me wonder.
2021-12-11 15:29:03
Interestingly I already had marked this post for myself to write a response, but I didn't have time yet.

I've been using several Bluetooth headsets for years now and I guess electromagnetic fields have an effect on humans but as far as I know there were many studies on it already which came to the conclusion that it isn't problematic for the body.
Also as far as I know Bluetooth doesn't use much power to send music (or whatever), the thing is, I've you're using your telephone to call somebody and place it near your ear, you're sending way more electromagnetic fields through your head than Bluetooth or WLAN would ever do. Many people underestimate how much power is needed to connect to a cell phone antenna in contrast to Bluetooth or WLAN. With 5G the needed power will go down as there will be way more antennas to connect to. But I'm not researching in this field and I know only a little bit about wireless networks. So only my two cents about it :)
2021-12-11 20:10:30
I file this in the same category as smoking. How long did it take for us to realize that smoking is bad for us? Not after one cigarette or one pack but weeks and months and years of continuous puffing. When it comes to your brain, why take the chance? 
2021-12-11 21:20:38
Any chance you two can have a debate about this and post it to the 
BeWellthy
 crowd?
2021-12-14 14:12:14
Ha, well it's a great topic for a future newsletter. So I can start off the debate by pointing to the data we have and then 
phaidenbauer
 can rebut. 
2021-12-14 14:55:24
Well, although that sounds interesting, I think my knowledge of the topic is way too low.

therealbrandonwilson
Continuing your thought on cigarettes, I think a doctor told me once that even one cigarette can already alter your lungs. Thinking about that I should stop using headphones immediately, the most important thing is the brain and I need to keep it as good as possible so my cryonic suspension isn't for nothing :)
2021-12-14 16:28:04
Cigarettes are definitely no bueno. In a podcast, Dave Asprey was asked whether he would smoke one cigarette or eat a plate of French fries. He said he would take the cigarette because the momentary hit is not as bad as the long-term effects of friend foods. Interesting! Yes, keep that brain in tip-top shape. 
2021-12-14 18:22:10