If you jump on a call with me and we argue a few points, I'll know how you think. If you win a few points and I win a few - now we're playing tennis. It's not a battle - it's a match. A match of wits.
Clubhouse is about thinking. Conversations in public require you to show up and think and respond and contribute to the conversation. If you dominate with your message - it'll be immediately obvious. If you ask questions and invite people to contribute you'll be rewarded with subliminal leadership points. Talk. Listen. Contribute. Question. Debate. These are all much easier on a live call where tone and vocal quality can help send clues about intentions and message.
If we're not willing to jump on a call or a zoom or a clubhouse - why? We can enrich all of our relationships by knowing more about each other and ourselves. When I know that abrahamKim likes to argue and is my brother gangster from another mother - then several chords of resonance can be heard far and wide. therealbrandonwilson has a lovely, resonant voice you perceive while listening to his Brandonian Doctrine podcast, but is it equally harmonic in a heated debate?
abrahamKim
therealbrandonwilson
brianball
-thumb.jpg)